You can step through this history commit by commit to find out exactly when work was done. The commit history of a master branch updated with squash merges will have one commitДЇor each merged branch. The topic branch, and the default branches keep a linear history through the use of squash merges. Contributors to the topic branch work how they want in Squash merging keeps your default branch histories clean and easy to follow without demanding any workflow changes on your team. Instead of each commit on the topic branchД«eing added to the history of the default branch, a squash merge takes all the file changes and adds them to a single new commit on the default branch.ДЄ simple way to think about this is that squash merge gives you just the file changes, and a regular merge gives you the file changes and the commit history. Squash merging is a merge option that allows you to condense the Git history of topic branches when you complete a pull request. This default branch is an accurate representation of the history of each topic branch, but it is difficult to use to answer broader questions about your project's development. The commit history on your master branch (or other default branch) does not follow a straight line because of the related topic branch history.ДЄs the project grows larger, the number of topic branches worked on at the same time increases, making the default branch history increasingly more difficult to follow. The comments and discussion in the pull request give additional context for the changes made in the topic branch. This merge adds the commits of the topic branch to your main branch and creates a merge commit to reconcile any conflicts between the default and topic branch. When you complete a pull request, you merge the topic branch into your default branch, usually master. Azure Repos | Azure DevOps Server 2020 | Azure DevOps Server 2019 | TFS 2018-TFS 2017 Pull requests and Git history

Change user sublime merge